Better car, RX-7 - FC3S or FD3S?

Question

Hi there... I currently own a RX-7 FD3S and I'm contented with its looks and performance... but you see, there would be an upcoming auction event that will showcase both FD3S and FC3S. now i'm considering buying another FD or then again, a FC for an addition to my collection because i just love the performance and the uniqueness of the rotary and it will also serve as a model car for my family's car shop. Somesay that FD is better than the FC, but somesay that it's the other way around. I know both are RX-7 models but i'm confused on how each vehicle compare to each other. So, my question is, what are the difference and similarities of the FC and FD of the RX-7 model? and please do cite some advantages and disadvanteges of each vehicle... Thank You, i will really appreciate the help... ^_^

Answer 1

Since you already have a FD, why not get a FC? A Rust-free FC would be an unmistakable way of showing off your family shop's prowess. Plus, most people that get into rotaries go for a FC because of the savings compared to a FD. A nice FC usually goes for around $3-4000 while a FD fetches around $10-16,000 depending on condition.



While the FD has more power in stock form (255hp, 217 ft.lbs torque), a Series 5 (89-91) FC TurboII is nearly as quick (200hp and 197 ft.lbs torque) and doesn't have all of the vacuum line BS that a FD does. It's also slightly lighter too, by maybe 50lbs. A Series 4 (86-88) TurboII is also a close contender to the FD, at 182hp and 186 ft.lbs, while weighing even less than the S5 TurboII.



Plus, the TurboII transmission can handle more power than a FD transmission. That's why it's the most popular choice for 20b swaps, coupled to either a 86-88 TurboII clutch-type LSD rear end (street use) or a Ford 9" rear end (drag applications). And in stock form, the FC has the same drag coefficient of 0.31 as the FD.



Getting back to the subject, a clean FC that has been correctly refurbished will be a shining example of how capable your shop is.

Answer 2

Seeing as all you did was refer to chassis types, you might consider using YEARS to distinguish the different cars, so people know what you're talking about.



Just as a suggestion.



The 1986-1992 RX-7s are a lot more plentiful, and certainly cheaper than the later generations. Just as many upgrades available, still plenty of fun....mainly just a matter of styling differences.



Personally, I'd be pretty content with either generation between the two. And I'd say the lower cost of the 2nd gen cars makes them a bit more appealing.

Answer 3

RX-7 hands down

Answer 4

rx7